| Steel face-sheet gauge | 14–16 gauge 1.90–1.52 mm nominal thickness | Confirm whether the stated gauge applies to each steel face sheet, the total door skin, or only a reinforcing component. Request the actual nominal thickness in millimetres or inches. | Lower gauge numbers generally indicate thicker steel. A thicker face sheet can improve resistance to denting, cutting, and localized deformation when properly supported by the core and frame. | A “heavy-duty” description without a stated face-sheet thickness; unusually thin skins hidden behind decorative cladding. |
| Steel gauge reference | Use the same gauge system for comparison | Common U.S. manufacturers’ standard-gauge nominal values are: 14 gauge = 0.0747 in / 1.90 mm; 16 gauge = 0.0598 in / 1.52 mm; 18 gauge = 0.0478 in / 1.21 mm; 20 gauge = 0.0359 in / 0.91 mm. | Gauge tables can vary by material and regional standard. Comparing the stated millimetre thickness is more reliable than comparing gauge numbers alone. | Mixing galvanized-sheet gauge, stainless-steel gauge, and unrelated wire-gauge values without identifying the standard used. |
| Door core design | Full-height reinforced core Mineral, steel-stiffened, or other documented security core | Ask for a cross-section showing the core, internal stiffeners, lock reinforcement, hinge reinforcement, and edge construction. Confirm whether the core is continuous or interrupted by voids. | Forced entry commonly exploits flexing, edge separation, lock-area failure, or hinge-side weakness. Face-sheet thickness alone does not describe the complete door assembly. | Hollow-core construction presented as equivalent to a reinforced security door; no cross-section or reinforcement schedule. |
| Frame and anchorage | Reinforced steel frame Anchored to structural substrate | Verify frame material and thickness, corner joints, strike reinforcement, anchor quantity and spacing, required wall construction, and installation instructions. | A strong door leaf can still be defeated if the frame twists, the strike pulls out, or the anchors are installed only into weak finish materials. | Test information covering only the door leaf; vague “fits any opening” claims; no anchorage details. |
| Lock and strike protection | Protected lock pocket Reinforced strike area | Confirm the lock type, number of locking points, bolt throw, bolt material, strike-box construction, and reinforcement around the lock and strike. | The lock area is a concentrated attack point. Reinforcement helps transfer attack loads into the door and frame instead of allowing local steel deformation. | Counting decorative locking points without identifying their engagement depth or structural reinforcement. |
| Hinges and hinge-side security | Heavy-duty hinges Plus non-removable hinge protection where applicable | Check hinge quantity, load rating, fastener type, hinge reinforcement, and whether the assembly includes fixed anti-lift pins or equivalent protection on exposed hinge sides. | Hinge protection is important when hinges are exposed or when the door can be attacked from the hinge side. The complete assembly must carry and retain the door leaf under attack. | Hinge claims based only on appearance; ordinary removable pins on an outward-opening door without additional protection. |
| ASTM F3038 forced-entry evidence | Assembly-specific test report With test outcome and configuration | Request the complete ASTM F3038 test report or an independently traceable summary identifying the door, frame, lock, hinges, hardware, wall condition, tools, test duration or sequence, observed breach condition, and any limitations. | ASTM F3038 is a forced-entry test method for security doors and door assemblies. Results apply to the tested configuration, not automatically to every size, hardware set, or installation. | “ASTM rated” with no report, no tested assembly details, no test date, or a result transferred from a different door or hardware configuration. |
| Interpreting forced-entry ratings | Compare like-for-like test results | Confirm whether a claimed level or rating is issued by a recognized testing laboratory, what pass/fail criteria were used, and whether the rating belongs to the complete installed assembly. | A test method and a marketing label are not interchangeable. The test specimen, tools, attack time, installation, and breach definition determine what the result actually demonstrates. | A numerical “rating” without the governing standard, test scope, pass/fail definition, or laboratory documentation. |
| Fire and smoke performance | Select only when required by the opening | If the opening requires fire protection, verify a separate fire-door listing, label, temperature exposure rating, compatible hardware, closer requirements, and installation limits. Do not infer fire performance from ASTM F3038 results. | Forced-entry resistance and fire resistance address different hazards and are demonstrated by different tests and listings. | Claims that a security-door forced-entry test automatically proves fire-door compliance. |
| Opening direction and fit | Match the door to the opening and threat side | Confirm nominal opening size, clear width, swing direction, reveal, threshold height, weather exposure, and whether the tested configuration used the same orientation and frame installation. | Gaps, improper reveals, weak substrates, and an unsuitable swing direction can reduce real-world security even when the door leaf is strong. | Field trimming, unapproved hardware substitutions, or installation into masonry, drywall, or timber without approved anchorage details. |